🔗 Share this article

Recently, a top US official returned from a southern state brandishing a small piece of metal, proclaiming it was the first rare-earth magnet manufactured in the US in 25 years.

He indicated that this was proof the US is ending “Beijing's grip on our supply chain.” Because of a new rare-earth mineral processing center in South Carolina, he noted, “We’re finally becoming independent again.”

Breaking China’s Dominance in Essential Minerals

Overthrowing Beijing's refining and production supremacy in these minerals, which are crucial for advanced electronics, batteries, and military equipment, is a major focus for the federal government. Via tariffs and other strategies, the US is relying on bringing the industry back to US soil.

Such measures prompted China to restrict rare-earth exports to the US and motivated US leaders to sign deals with an ally, a partner, another nation, and a key Asian economy.

Although the US and China have now reached a trade truce on rare earths, Beijing—with approximately the majority of global mining and nearly all of global processing capacity—has a head start that will be difficult to diminish.

“These materials are essential for electric motors but also in guidance systems that have clear uses for the defense department,” notes an industry expert. “Anything that has a decent magnet in it uses rare earths.”

No Easy Fix for American Self-Sufficiency

It won't be simple for the US to reduce its dependence on imports from China of minerals essential to national security, chip manufacturing, and the shift from traditional energy to renewable sources. According to official sources, the US imported 80% of the rare earths it used in recent years.

For some rare-earth minerals such as a key element, essential for chip production, and samarium, essential to defense systems, Chinese refinement dominance rises to 99%. These elements are used in magnets essential for EV motors and power systems in renewable energy, along with applications for cellphones, advanced lighting, and nuclear reactors.

Extended Timelines and International Resources

Initiatives to reduce the US’s dependence on China's output of rare-earth minerals may require a long time. Experts note that “These minerals” is not entirely accurate because they’re not that uncommon in the planet's surface, but many reserves, including those in Ukraine, where an agreement was signed recently, are only in the initial phases of extraction.

“It’s not that there’s a shortage itself, it’s that Beijing can control how much is sent abroad,” a specialist said, noting that obtaining export licenses from China can be a lengthy, difficult process.

Greenland, another focus of US attention, and South America, are two other countries with significant rare-earth resources. In the continental US, there are reserves in California, Wyoming, and Missouri, with the biggest active site operating at a key location, the state, about 60 miles from a major city.

Government Initiatives and Investment

Recently, the US Department of Defense became the major investor in an industry operator, with plans to open a new “mine-to-magnet” plant, called a new facility, to produce magnets crucial for F-35 fighter jets, drones, and submarines.

Across the continent, estimated reserves of rare earths were estimated to include 3.6m tons in the US and more than 14m tons in the northern neighbor—significantly lower than the 44m tons estimated to be in the Asian giant.

Following government funding in the steel industry and US chipmakers, the federal agency said it was prepared to make direct investments in critical mineral companies.

“You’re competing against government-backed investment because Beijing is selecting these as priority areas that they aim to control,” a cabinet member stated during a speech in April.

The official floated that the US could use a national investment pool to accelerate production. “Why wouldn’t the wealthiest country in the world not possess the biggest state investment fund?” he asked.

Past Challenges and Future Outlook

US efforts to promote homegrown output have floundered in the past when China cut costs, rendering unsupported rare-earth development uneconomic against China’s lower cost of production and long-term strategic outlook.

In the past, a market expert testified before a US Senate committee that “nations that fund in battery capacity and supply chains today are poised to lead this sector for generations to come. It is not too late for the US but action is needed now.”

Since then, a scramble to assemble international partnerships around rare earths is accelerating.

“In about a year from now, we’ll have so much essential resources that you won’t know what to do with them,” a top leader informed the media. This followed eight months after a demand for compensation in the form of natural resources from another country. More recently, the authorities in Asia agreed to a contract with an US firm, securing rights to minerals such as key metals.

Prospects for Success

But, can the US make up its shortfall and loosen China’s hold on rare-earth global networks? “The US has taken really significant steps so far,” a specialist comments. The nation, he adds, is unlikely to become “independent in the short term because it requires years to bring a mine online and establish processing plants.”